vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $4.6B, roughly 1.6× EMCOR Group, Inc.). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 6.6%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 12.3%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
EMCOR Group, Inc., is an engineering, construction, and property management company headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut.
APH vs EME — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $4.6B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $305.5M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 8.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 19.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $6.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | $305.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $434.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $295.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $302.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $240.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $292.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $270.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | $6.84 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $9.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $6.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $6.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $5.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $6.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $5.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $5.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $916.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $9.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $655.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $486.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $576.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $807.3M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $558.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 0.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $558.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $524.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $475.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $193.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $469.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $526.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $279.7M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $492.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $448.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $165.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $82.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $451.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $508.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $260.4M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
EME
Segment breakdown not available.