vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $4.2B, roughly 1.8× Diamondback Energy). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 0.6%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 30.7%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.
APH vs FANG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $4.2B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 38.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $-1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $699.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $659.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $837.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -82.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 46.6% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $-4.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $3.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $2.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $4.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $3.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $3.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $4.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $-174.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $42.6B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $70.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | $-174.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $370.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $12.0B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | $42.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $37.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $39.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $38.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $38.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $37.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $37.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $17.4B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | $70.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $71.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $76.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $71.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $70.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $67.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $65.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $35.6B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.7B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 40.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 27.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 73.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | 73.12× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
FANG
| Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquid sales | $3.8B | 90% |
| Sales of purchased oil | $385.0M | 9% |
