vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and General Dynamics (GD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
General Dynamics is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5B vs $7.6B, roughly 1.8× Amphenol). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 8.3%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 10.3%). General Dynamics produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.0B vs $831.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 6.1%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S.
APH vs GD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $13.5B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 8.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 10.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 13.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $4.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $13.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $13.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $12.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $12.0B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $994.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $930.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $905.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | $4.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $6.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $26.1B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $59.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | $26.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $25.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $24.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $23.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $22.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $22.0B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | $59.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $57.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $57.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $56.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $56.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $55.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $57.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $55.4B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $2.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 14.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $6.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $-148.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $814.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $-290.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $613.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 5.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | -0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 1.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
GD
Segment breakdown not available.
