vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Galaxy Digital Inc. (GLXY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Galaxy Digital Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.4B vs $7.6B, roughly 1.4× Amphenol). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs -4.6%, a 17.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($831.2M vs $-1.6B).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Galaxy Digital Inc. is a digital assets and blockchain-focused financial services firm headquartered in New York City. Founded by Michael Novogratz in 2018, the company offers asset management, trading, investment banking, and digital infrastructure services—including data center and high-performance computing operations—to institutional clients in the crypto and broader digital economy. It is listed on Nasdaq under the ticker GLXY.
APH vs GLXY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $10.4B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $-481.7M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | -5.4% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $28.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $8.9B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $-481.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $505.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $-33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $-125.6M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -1.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $11.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $11.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $-1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $-1.6B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | -15.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $-1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $427.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $329.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $189.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-67.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 10.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
GLXY
| Digital Assets Sales | $10.2B | 99% |
| Blockchain Rewards | $57.0M | 1% |
| Fee | $27.4M | 0% |
| Blockchain Rewards From Non Customers | $1.7M | 0% |
