vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Stanley Black & Decker (SWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $3.8B, roughly 2.0× Stanley Black & Decker). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 1.4%, a 11.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 0.1%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($831.2M vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
APH vs SWK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $51.4M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | -43.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $194.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $91.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $-11.2M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 28.4% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $268.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $5.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $21.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $311.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $344.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $290.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $318.5M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $9.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $21.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $22.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $22.5B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $221.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $155.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 4.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 4.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $369.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $-420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $679.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $573.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $134.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $-485.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $564.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $485.8M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | -13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | -4.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 3.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
