vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and TJX Companies (TJX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TJX Companies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1B vs $7.6B, roughly 2.0× Amphenol). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 9.5%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 7.5%). TJX Companies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $831.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs -4.0%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
The TJX Companies, Inc. is an American multinational off-price department store corporation, headquartered in Framingham, Massachusetts. It was formed as a subsidiary of Zayre Corp. in 1987, and became the legal successor to Zayre Corp. following a company reorganization in 1989.
APH vs TJX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $15.1B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 11.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $1.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $15.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $12.5B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $1.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $4.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $9.4B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $35.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $7.5B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $35.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $32.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $31.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $31.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $32.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $30.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $29.7B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 1.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $4.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $394.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $737.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-103.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $624.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $318.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
TJX
| Marmaxx | $9.0B | 60% |
| Home Goods | $2.5B | 17% |
| TJX International | $2.0B | 14% |
| Tjx Canada | $1.5B | 10% |
