vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $4.0B, roughly 1.9× Viking Holdings Ltd). Viking Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 12.4%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
APH vs VIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $4.0B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $514.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 35.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $1.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $718.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $514.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $439.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $-105.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $379.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $159.8M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 73.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 55.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 74.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | -14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $803.5M |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $11.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $803.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $278.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $-267.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $-688.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $663.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $663.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $470.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $587.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $419.8M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 2.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
VIK
Segment breakdown not available.
