vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Applied Digital Corp. (APLD) and Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. (MCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Applied Digital Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.6M vs $88.5M, roughly 1.4× Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.). Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs -11.4%, a 46.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Applied Digital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (98.2% vs 25.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Applied Digital Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (70.9% CAGR vs 14.3%).
BAE Systems Digital Intelligence is an international defence and security technology firm owned by BAE Systems. They specialize in delivering digital solutions that enable rapid, data-driven decision-making. Their services, solutions and products span customers in Law Enforcement, National Security, Government Departments and Government Enterprises, Critical National Infrastructure, Telecommunications, the Military, and Space.
Sandy Spring Bancorp, Inc. was a bank holding company headquartered in Olney, Maryland and operating in the Washington metropolitan area. In addition to banking services, the company offered commercial and personal lines of insurance, surety bonds, workers compensation insurance, and professional liability insurance protection as well as financial planning, wealth management, and asset management for high-net-worth individuals, businesses, and associations. In April 2025, the company was acqu...
APLD vs MCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $126.6M | $88.5M |
| Net Profit | $-14.4M | $31.4M |
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -11.4% | 35.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 98.2% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 89.6% | 92.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $2.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $126.6M | $88.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.2M | $79.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.3M | $76.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.9M | $70.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.9M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.7M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.7M | $67.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-52.5M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.5M | $16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | 46.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.7% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.4% | 35.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -11.4% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -26.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 157.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.2% | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -217.2% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -147.5% | 24.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.92 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $2.74 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.66 | $1.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $1.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.57 | $1.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $948.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $8.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $393.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | $385.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.6M | $152.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.7M | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.2M | $200.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.2M | $318.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $244.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $948.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $743.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $732.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $497.7M | $723.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.6M | $737.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.6M | $729.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.8M | $715.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.8M | $692.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $937.7M | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $762.9M | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-567.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -448.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 436.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.8M | $88.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.0M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-52.3M | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.1M | $35.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-567.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-331.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-191.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-251.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-223.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-130.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -448.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -516.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 574.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -475.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -349.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -215.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -203.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 436.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 388.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -595.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 486.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 267.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 125.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APLD
| HPC Hosting Business | $85.0M | 67% |
| Data Center Hosting Business | $41.6M | 33% |
MCB
Segment breakdown not available.
