vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apollo Global Management (APO) and Morgan Stanley (MS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Morgan Stanley is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.7B vs $9.9B, roughly 1.1× Apollo Global Management). Morgan Stanley runs the higher net margin — 52.6% vs 6.9%, a 45.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Apollo Global Management posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (86.7% vs 16.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Apollo Global Management's revenue compounded faster (18.4% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Apollo Global Management, Inc. is an American asset management firm that primarily invests in alternative assets. As of 2025, the company had $840 billion of assets under management, including $392 billion invested in credit, including mezzanine capital, hedge funds, non-performing loans, and collateralized loan obligations, $99 billion invested in private equity, and $46.2 billion invested in real assets, which includes real estate and infrastructure. The company invests money on behalf of p...
Morgan Stanley is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered at 1585 Broadway in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. With offices in 42 countries and more than 80,000 employees, the firm's clients include corporations, governments, institutions, and individuals. Morgan Stanley ranked No. 61 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue and in the same year ranked No. 30 in the Forbes Global 2000.
APO vs MS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9B | $10.7B |
| Net Profit | $684.0M | $5.6B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 52.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 86.7% | 16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | $17.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | $18.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $17.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $15.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $684.0M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $630.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $442.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.0M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 27.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.78 | $2.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $1.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.3B | $5.1M |
| Total Assets | $460.9B | $1581.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $111.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $103.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $90.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $91.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $341.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | $324.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | $320.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | $297.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8B | $291.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $269.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.3B | $111.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1B | $110.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3B | $108.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $106.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.9B | $103.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3B | $100.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1581.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.9B | $1420.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.5B | $1364.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.6B | $1353.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.0B | $1300.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.7B | $1258.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.5B | $1212.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 2.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.55× | 2.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | 2.68× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.7B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $-2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | $-3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $-24.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.83× | -0.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | -0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.00× | 3.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.29× | -5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APO
| Retirement Services Segment | $8.5B | 86% |
| Asset Management1 | $681.0M | 7% |
| Principal Investing Segment | $624.0M | 6% |
| Management Service Incentive | $96.0M | 1% |
MS
Segment breakdown not available.
