vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.8× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs 4.7%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
APOG vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $173.1M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $20.7M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $22.8M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $49.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 2.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
