vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Janus International Group, Inc. (JBI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $219.3M, roughly 1.6× Janus International Group, Inc.). Janus International Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 4.7%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.9% CAGR vs -8.8%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
APOG vs JBI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $219.3M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $15.2M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 13.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | 28.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $228.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $210.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $230.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $248.4M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $15.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $300.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $27.6M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | 38.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 39.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | 43.9% |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $560.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $102.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $110.1M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $543.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $526.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $518.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $526.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $556.3M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $15.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | 0.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $140.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $51.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $31.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $45.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $25.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 4.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 171.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 3.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
JBI
| Self Storage New Construction | $72.3M | 33% |
| Commercial And Others | $65.5M | 30% |
| Self Storage R3 | $54.0M | 25% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $15.5M | 7% |
| Transferred Over Time | $12.8M | 6% |
