vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $348.6M, roughly 1.6× APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 4.7%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -1.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
APOG vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $348.6M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $16.5M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.2% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.77 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $500.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $361.8M | $503.8M |
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $119.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.71 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.3M | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $512.3M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | $133.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $471.0M | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.1M | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.3M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.77× | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | $176.1M |
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Transferred At Point In Time | $163.0M | 47% |
| Architectural Services Segment | $105.2M | 30% |
| Performance Surfaces | $53.0M | 15% |
| UW Interco LLC | $27.9M | 8% |
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
