vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.2× Trip.com Group Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs 4.7%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
APOG vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $242.7M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 30.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $34.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
