vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.6× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 4.7%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
APOG vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
