vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $351.4M, roughly 1.2× APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 4.7%, a 43.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
APOG vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.