vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APPFOLIO INC (APPF) and Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $262.2M, roughly 1.0× APPFOLIO INC). APPFOLIO INC runs the higher net margin — 16.2% vs 13.1%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APPFOLIO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.4% vs -1.5%).
AppFolio, Inc. is an American company founded in 2006 that offers software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications and services to the real estate industry.
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
APPF vs BORR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $262.2M | $267.7M |
| Net Profit | $42.4M | $35.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 36.0% |
| Net Margin | 16.2% | 13.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.4% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 35.2% | 10.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $262.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $235.6M | $267.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.4M | $271.9M |
| Q1 26 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $31.7M |
| Q1 26 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 36.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.3% | 38.4% |
| Q1 26 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.0% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.79 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $147.4M | $92.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.2M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $580.6M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $147.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.5M | $92.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $195.3M |
| Q1 26 | $470.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $498.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $455.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $519.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $412.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.4M | $999.2M |
| Q1 26 | $580.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $689.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $640.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $567.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $564.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $626.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $523.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $479.3M | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.3M | $6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.81× | 0.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.46× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | 0.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APPF
| Value Added Services | $201.4M | 77% |
| Subscription Services | $58.2M | 22% |
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
