vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS) and Bark, Inc. (BARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Turbine, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $98.4M, roughly 1.5× Bark, Inc.). Digital Turbine, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -8.8%, a 12.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Turbine, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs -22.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Turbine, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs -10.0%).
Digital Turbine, Inc. is a global ad technology company that provides end-to-end mobile app monetization, user acquisition, and targeted advertising solutions. It partners with mobile network operators, original equipment manufacturers, and app developers to deliver seamless, contextually relevant app experiences and ad engagements to end users across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, serving core segments of telecom, mobile tech and consumer app industries.
Flying Bark Productions Pty. Ltd. is an Australian entertainment and animation studio that is a subsidiary of Belgian production company Studio 100. The studio acts as a full-service production facility across feature films, television and an assorted range of digital content. The studio was established by Yoram and Sandra Gross in 1967 as Yoram Gross Film Studios, and its stake was acquired by Australian media group Village Roadshow in 1996 before their stake was sold to German media & enter...
APPS vs BARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $98.4M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.3% | -9.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -8.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.4% | -22.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 122.1% | 24.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $151.4M | $98.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $102.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $115.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.6M | $126.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.7M | $126.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | $116.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.2M | $121.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.2M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-236.5M | $-4.9M |
| Q4 25 | 57.4% | 62.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 57.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.6% | 62.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.0% | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 60.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 63.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.3% | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.4% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | -9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -185.2% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | -8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.2% | -10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.2% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -210.7% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.33 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $21.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $355.0M | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $194.6M | $81.2M |
| Total Assets | $858.2M | $188.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.82× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.8M | $63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $84.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | $115.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.9M | $125.5M |
| Q4 25 | $355.0M | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $408.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.6M | $40.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.8M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $383.5M | $39.9M |
| Q4 25 | $194.6M | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.1M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $94.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.0M | $99.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.6M | $113.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.4M | $123.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.0M | $128.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $213.9M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | $858.2M | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.7M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $818.4M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.9M | $260.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $839.7M | $292.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $844.5M | $301.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $860.2M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $865.5M | $298.6M |
| Q4 25 | 1.82× | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.50× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.01× | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.79× | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.2M | $1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-36.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $966.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-251.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APPS
| On Device Solutions | $99.6M | 66% |
| App Growth Platform | $52.6M | 35% |
BARK
| Toys Accessories | $46.0M | 47% |
| Consumables | $30.2M | 31% |
| Commerce Segment | $18.9M | 19% |
| Other | $3.4M | 3% |
