vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Turbine, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $129.0M, roughly 1.2× Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.). Digital Turbine, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 1.5%, a 1.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs 12.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 16.2%).
Digital Turbine, Inc. is a global ad technology company that provides end-to-end mobile app monetization, user acquisition, and targeted advertising solutions. It partners with mobile network operators, original equipment manufacturers, and app developers to deliver seamless, contextually relevant app experiences and ad engagements to end users across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, serving core segments of telecom, mobile tech and consumer app industries.
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
APPS vs BWMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $129.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.3% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.4% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 122.1% | -66.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $151.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.6M | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.7M | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $112.2M | $94.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0M | $771.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-236.5M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 57.4% | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.6% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.0% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 52.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.3% | 50.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -185.2% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.8% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -210.7% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.33 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $11.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $355.0M | $57.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $194.6M | $261.1M |
| Total Assets | $858.2M | $579.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.82× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.9M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $355.0M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.5M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $408.7M | $36.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.2M | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.6M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.8M | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $383.5M | $26.8M |
| Q4 25 | $194.6M | $261.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.1M | $261.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $249.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.0M | $244.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.6M | $246.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.4M | $243.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.0M | $235.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $213.9M | $167.3M |
| Q4 25 | $858.2M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.7M | $510.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $818.4M | $538.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.9M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $839.7M | $505.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $844.5M | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $860.2M | $463.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $865.5M | $420.5M |
| Q4 25 | 1.82× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.68× | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.50× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.01× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.79× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.2M | $9.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | 4.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $33.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.7M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.7M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | 4.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APPS
| On Device Solutions | $99.6M | 66% |
| App Growth Platform | $52.6M | 35% |
BWMN
Segment breakdown not available.
