vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS) and LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Turbine, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $145.8M, roughly 1.0× LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP). Digital Turbine, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -5.2%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Digital Turbine, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.4% vs 9.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Digital Turbine, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Digital Turbine, Inc. is a global ad technology company that provides end-to-end mobile app monetization, user acquisition, and targeted advertising solutions. It partners with mobile network operators, original equipment manufacturers, and app developers to deliver seamless, contextually relevant app experiences and ad engagements to end users across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, serving core segments of telecom, mobile tech and consumer app industries.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is an American semiconductor company specializing in the design and manufacturing of low power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Headquartered in the Silicon Forest area of Hillsboro, Oregon, the company also has operations in San Jose, Calif., Shanghai, Manila, Penang, and Singapore. Lattice Semiconductor has more than 1000 employees and an annual revenue of more than $660 million as of 2022. The company was founded in 1983 and went public in 1989. It ...
APPS vs LSCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $145.8M |
| Net Profit | $5.1M | $-7.6M |
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.3% | 30.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.4% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 122.1% | 14.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $145.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $133.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.9M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $120.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.6M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.7M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | $124.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.1M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.2M | $22.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.1% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.6% | 68.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.4% | 68.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.0% | 61.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 69.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 68.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.5% | -10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.20 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.24 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.25 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $40.2M | $133.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $355.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $194.6M | $714.1M |
| Total Assets | $858.2M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.82× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $40.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.8M | $117.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.4M | $127.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | $136.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1M | $124.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $109.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $355.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $408.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $408.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $407.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $714.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $194.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.1M | $706.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.3M | $687.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $154.0M | $707.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $163.6M | $710.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.4M | $703.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.0M | $698.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $883.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $858.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.7M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $818.4M | $808.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.9M | $823.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $839.7M | $843.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $844.5M | $853.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $860.2M | $827.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.65× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $14.2M | $57.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $44.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 30.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $153.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5M | $47.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4M | $45.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.7M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4M | $21.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APPS
| On Device Solutions | $99.6M | 66% |
| App Growth Platform | $52.6M | 35% |
LSCC
Segment breakdown not available.
