vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA PRO TECH LTD (APT) and Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. (BHM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.9M vs $13.9M, roughly 1.4× ALPHA PRO TECH LTD). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -50.1%, a 55.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs 0.3%). Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.4M vs $51.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (30.1% CAGR vs 1.4%).

Alpha Pro Tech Ltd is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of disposable protective apparel, face masks, and building supply products including weather-resistant barriers. It primarily serves the healthcare, industrial, and construction sectors, with core operating markets concentrated in North America.

Bluerock Homes Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust that acquires, owns and operates a portfolio of high-quality single-family rental residential properties. It caters to middle-market renters across high-growth suburban markets, prioritizing regions with strong demographic fundamentals and sustained rental housing demand.

APT vs BHM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BHM
BHM
1.4× larger
BHM
$18.9M
$13.9M
APT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BHM
BHM
+35.6% gap
BHM
35.9%
0.3%
APT
Higher net margin
APT
APT
55.2% more per $
APT
5.0%
-50.1%
BHM
More free cash flow
BHM
BHM
$10.4M more FCF
BHM
$10.4M
$51.0K
APT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BHM
BHM
Annualised
BHM
30.1%
1.4%
APT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Revenue
$13.9M
$18.9M
Net Profit
$698.0K
$-9.5M
Gross Margin
37.1%
Operating Margin
6.9%
-48.8%
Net Margin
5.0%
-50.1%
Revenue YoY
0.3%
35.9%
Net Profit YoY
-17.6%
-29.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.06
$-0.75

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$13.9M
$18.9M
Q3 25
$14.8M
$16.6M
Q2 25
$16.7M
$16.8M
Q1 25
$13.8M
$16.4M
Q4 24
$13.8M
$13.9M
Q3 24
$14.3M
$12.7M
Q2 24
$16.3M
$12.5M
Q1 24
$13.5M
$11.2M
Net Profit
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$698.0K
$-9.5M
Q3 25
$976.0K
$-10.0M
Q2 25
$1.2M
$-5.8M
Q1 25
$613.0K
$-7.3M
Q4 24
$847.0K
$-7.3M
Q3 24
$862.0K
$3.5M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$-5.2M
Q1 24
$576.0K
$-3.2M
Gross Margin
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
37.1%
Q3 25
39.7%
Q2 25
36.8%
Q1 25
39.0%
Q4 24
37.6%
Q3 24
38.5%
Q2 24
42.0%
Q1 24
40.2%
Operating Margin
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
6.9%
-48.8%
Q3 25
7.4%
-57.6%
Q2 25
8.0%
-30.9%
Q1 25
3.3%
-42.6%
Q4 24
4.9%
-52.8%
Q3 24
5.2%
27.9%
Q2 24
10.5%
-41.3%
Q1 24
2.4%
-28.4%
Net Margin
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
5.0%
-50.1%
Q3 25
6.6%
-60.0%
Q2 25
7.5%
-34.7%
Q1 25
4.4%
-44.7%
Q4 24
6.1%
-52.8%
Q3 24
6.0%
27.9%
Q2 24
10.1%
-41.3%
Q1 24
4.3%
-28.4%
EPS (diluted)
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$0.06
$-0.75
Q3 25
$0.09
$-0.94
Q2 25
$0.12
$-0.66
Q1 25
$0.06
$-0.67
Q4 24
$0.07
$-0.65
Q3 24
$0.08
$0.24
Q2 24
$0.15
$-0.42
Q1 24
$0.05
$-0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$17.0M
$169.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$428.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$62.5M
$128.7M
Total Assets
$74.1M
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.33×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$17.0M
$169.6M
Q3 25
$17.7M
$2.1M
Q2 25
$14.5M
$4.2M
Q1 25
$13.4M
$3.0M
Q4 24
$18.6M
$115.2M
Q3 24
$18.4M
$155.1M
Q2 24
$16.2M
$116.0M
Q1 24
$18.5M
$92.3M
Total Debt
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$428.4M
Q3 25
$415.9M
Q2 25
$338.6M
Q1 25
$336.5M
Q4 24
$373.8M
Q3 24
$122.5M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Q1 24
$120.2M
Stockholders' Equity
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$62.5M
$128.7M
Q3 25
$62.5M
$131.7M
Q2 25
$62.2M
$135.3M
Q1 25
$61.7M
$137.1M
Q4 24
$62.2M
$139.1M
Q3 24
$62.1M
$142.9M
Q2 24
$62.0M
$142.5M
Q1 24
$61.6M
$144.5M
Total Assets
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$74.1M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$73.9M
$222.1M
Q2 25
$73.2M
$220.3M
Q1 25
$72.2M
$186.2M
Q4 24
$73.7M
$967.0M
Q3 24
$73.3M
$800.8M
Q2 24
$72.7M
$756.2M
Q1 24
$72.7M
$727.4M
Debt / Equity
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
3.33×
Q3 25
3.16×
Q2 25
2.50×
Q1 25
2.45×
Q4 24
2.69×
Q3 24
0.86×
Q2 24
0.84×
Q1 24
0.83×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$318.0K
$27.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$51.0K
$10.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.4%
55.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.9%
91.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.46×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.7M
$25.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$318.0K
$27.8M
Q3 25
$3.9M
$13.4M
Q2 25
$2.1M
$13.9M
Q1 25
$-4.0M
$951.0K
Q4 24
$2.4M
$9.1M
Q3 24
$5.3M
$1.7M
Q2 24
$-873.0K
$1.3M
Q1 24
$-1.2M
$1.1M
Free Cash Flow
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
$51.0K
$10.4M
Q3 25
$3.8M
$8.7M
Q2 25
$1.9M
$8.8M
Q1 25
$-4.1M
$-2.9M
Q4 24
$970.0K
$-253.0K
Q3 24
$3.2M
$-601.0K
Q2 24
$-1.0M
$-654.0K
Q1 24
$-1.3M
$-630.0K
FCF Margin
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
0.4%
55.0%
Q3 25
25.9%
52.4%
Q2 25
11.7%
52.2%
Q1 25
-29.6%
-17.6%
Q4 24
7.0%
-1.8%
Q3 24
22.3%
-4.7%
Q2 24
-6.2%
-5.2%
Q1 24
-9.3%
-5.6%
Capex Intensity
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
1.9%
91.8%
Q3 25
0.7%
28.5%
Q2 25
0.8%
30.3%
Q1 25
1.0%
23.4%
Q4 24
10.4%
66.9%
Q3 24
15.1%
18.0%
Q2 24
0.8%
15.3%
Q1 24
0.6%
15.5%
Cash Conversion
APT
APT
BHM
BHM
Q4 25
0.46×
Q3 25
4.02×
Q2 25
1.68×
Q1 25
-6.46×
Q4 24
2.85×
Q3 24
6.18×
0.47×
Q2 24
-0.53×
Q1 24
-2.03×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

APT
APT

Other$7.3M53%
Disposable Protective Apparel$6.6M47%

BHM
BHM

Residential Communities Segment$11.4M61%
Scattered Single Family Homes Segment$7.5M39%

Related Comparisons