vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA PRO TECH LTD (APT) and Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Cosmos Health Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.7M vs $13.9M, roughly 1.4× ALPHA PRO TECH LTD). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -51.5%, a 56.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cosmos Health Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.5% vs 0.3%). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.0K vs $-4.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Cosmos Health Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.2% CAGR vs 1.4%).

Alpha Pro Tech Ltd is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of disposable protective apparel, face masks, and building supply products including weather-resistant barriers. It primarily serves the healthcare, industrial, and construction sectors, with core operating markets concentrated in North America.

AgniKul Cosmos Private Limited is a private Indian aerospace manufacturer and commercial launch service provider based in National Centre for Combustion Research and Development (NCCRD) of IIT Madras, Chennai. The start up aims to develop and launch its own small-lift launch vehicle such as the Agnibaan, capable of placing 100 kg (220 lb) payload into a 700 km (430 mi) orbit.

APT vs COSM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
COSM
COSM
1.4× larger
COSM
$19.7M
$13.9M
APT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
COSM
COSM
+38.2% gap
COSM
38.5%
0.3%
APT
Higher net margin
APT
APT
56.5% more per $
APT
5.0%
-51.5%
COSM
More free cash flow
APT
APT
$4.7M more FCF
APT
$51.0K
$-4.6M
COSM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
COSM
COSM
Annualised
COSM
16.2%
1.4%
APT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Revenue
$13.9M
$19.7M
Net Profit
$698.0K
$-10.1M
Gross Margin
37.1%
10.6%
Operating Margin
6.9%
-57.9%
Net Margin
5.0%
-51.5%
Revenue YoY
0.3%
38.5%
Net Profit YoY
-17.6%
-203.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.06
$-0.33

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$13.9M
$19.7M
Q3 25
$14.8M
$17.1M
Q2 25
$16.7M
$14.7M
Q1 25
$13.8M
$13.7M
Q4 24
$13.8M
$14.2M
Q3 24
$14.3M
$12.4M
Q2 24
$16.3M
$13.2M
Q1 24
$13.5M
$14.6M
Net Profit
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$698.0K
$-10.1M
Q3 25
$976.0K
$-5.4M
Q2 25
$1.2M
$-2.8M
Q1 25
$613.0K
$-818.1K
Q4 24
$847.0K
$-3.3M
Q3 24
$862.0K
$-8.4M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$-2.6M
Q1 24
$576.0K
$-1.9M
Gross Margin
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
37.1%
10.6%
Q3 25
39.7%
15.2%
Q2 25
36.8%
7.9%
Q1 25
39.0%
14.9%
Q4 24
37.6%
7.1%
Q3 24
38.5%
9.7%
Q2 24
42.0%
5.8%
Q1 24
40.2%
9.1%
Operating Margin
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
6.9%
-57.9%
Q3 25
7.4%
-10.6%
Q2 25
8.0%
-17.9%
Q1 25
3.3%
-6.1%
Q4 24
4.9%
-63.0%
Q3 24
5.2%
-18.0%
Q2 24
10.5%
-18.9%
Q1 24
2.4%
-12.6%
Net Margin
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
5.0%
-51.5%
Q3 25
6.6%
-31.3%
Q2 25
7.5%
-19.2%
Q1 25
4.4%
-6.0%
Q4 24
6.1%
-23.5%
Q3 24
6.0%
-67.5%
Q2 24
10.1%
-19.6%
Q1 24
4.3%
-12.8%
EPS (diluted)
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$0.06
$-0.33
Q3 25
$0.09
$-0.17
Q2 25
$0.12
$-0.10
Q1 25
$0.06
$-0.03
Q4 24
$0.07
$-0.46
Q3 24
$0.08
$-0.45
Q2 24
$0.15
$-0.15
Q1 24
$0.05
$-0.11

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$17.0M
$761.8K
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$62.5M
$18.4M
Total Assets
$74.1M
$65.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$17.0M
$761.8K
Q3 25
$17.7M
$922.6K
Q2 25
$14.5M
$30.3K
Q1 25
$13.4M
$25.3K
Q4 24
$18.6M
$336.3K
Q3 24
$18.4M
$22.8K
Q2 24
$16.2M
$21.5K
Q1 24
$18.5M
$21.3K
Total Debt
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$3.8M
Q3 25
$5.4M
Q2 25
$5.2M
Q1 25
$4.9M
Q4 24
$4.1M
Q3 24
$4.3M
Q2 24
$3.9M
Q1 24
$4.1M
Stockholders' Equity
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$62.5M
$18.4M
Q3 25
$62.5M
$23.1M
Q2 25
$62.2M
$26.2M
Q1 25
$61.7M
$26.0M
Q4 24
$62.2M
$24.5M
Q3 24
$62.1M
$35.0M
Q2 24
$62.0M
$32.1M
Q1 24
$61.6M
$34.5M
Total Assets
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$74.1M
$65.5M
Q3 25
$73.9M
$69.5M
Q2 25
$73.2M
$61.8M
Q1 25
$72.2M
$57.2M
Q4 24
$73.7M
$54.3M
Q3 24
$73.3M
$64.5M
Q2 24
$72.7M
$60.8M
Q1 24
$72.7M
$62.3M
Debt / Equity
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
0.23×
Q2 25
0.20×
Q1 25
0.19×
Q4 24
0.17×
Q3 24
0.12×
Q2 24
0.12×
Q1 24
0.12×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$318.0K
$-4.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$51.0K
$-4.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.4%
-23.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.9%
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.46×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.7M
$-8.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$318.0K
$-4.6M
Q3 25
$3.9M
$-2.5M
Q2 25
$2.1M
$-1.2M
Q1 25
$-4.0M
$-186.3K
Q4 24
$2.4M
$-3.8M
Q3 24
$5.3M
$739.8K
Q2 24
$-873.0K
$-1.2M
Q1 24
$-1.2M
$-3.4M
Free Cash Flow
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
$51.0K
$-4.6M
Q3 25
$3.8M
$-2.5M
Q2 25
$1.9M
$-1.2M
Q1 25
$-4.1M
$-198.8K
Q4 24
$970.0K
$-3.9M
Q3 24
$3.2M
$511.0K
Q2 24
$-1.0M
$-1.2M
Q1 24
$-1.3M
$-3.5M
FCF Margin
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
0.4%
-23.4%
Q3 25
25.9%
-14.4%
Q2 25
11.7%
-8.4%
Q1 25
-29.6%
-1.5%
Q4 24
7.0%
-27.5%
Q3 24
22.3%
4.1%
Q2 24
-6.2%
-9.4%
Q1 24
-9.3%
-24.0%
Capex Intensity
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
1.9%
0.0%
Q3 25
0.7%
0.1%
Q2 25
0.8%
0.2%
Q1 25
1.0%
0.1%
Q4 24
10.4%
0.5%
Q3 24
15.1%
1.8%
Q2 24
0.8%
0.3%
Q1 24
0.6%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
APT
APT
COSM
COSM
Q4 25
0.46×
Q3 25
4.02×
Q2 25
1.68×
Q1 25
-6.46×
Q4 24
2.85×
Q3 24
6.18×
Q2 24
-0.53×
Q1 24
-2.03×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

APT
APT

Other$7.3M53%
Disposable Protective Apparel$6.6M47%

COSM
COSM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons