vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA PRO TECH LTD (APT) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDMARK BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.9M, roughly 1.3× ALPHA PRO TECH LTD). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs 5.0%, a 27.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.5% vs 0.3%). LANDMARK BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $51.0K). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.9% CAGR vs 1.4%).
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of disposable protective apparel, face masks, and building supply products including weather-resistant barriers. It primarily serves the healthcare, industrial, and construction sectors, with core operating markets concentrated in North America.
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
APT vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.9M | $18.7M |
| Net Profit | $698.0K | $4.7M |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 31.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 32.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | 18.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.6% | 44.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $698.0K | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $976.0K | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.0K | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.0K | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $862.0K | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $576.0K | $2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 23.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | 19.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $62.5M | $160.6M |
| Total Assets | $74.1M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.5M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2M | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.7M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.1M | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.0M | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.6M | $126.7M |
| Q4 25 | $74.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.7M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $318.0K | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.0K | $21.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 112.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.46× | 4.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | $39.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $318.0K | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-873.0K | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0K | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.0K | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.6% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.3% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 9.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.02× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.68× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.46× | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.18× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.53× | 1.45× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.03× | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APT
| Other | $7.3M | 53% |
| Disposable Protective Apparel | $6.6M | 47% |
LARK
Segment breakdown not available.
