vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA PRO TECH LTD (APT) and Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALPHA PRO TECH LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.9M vs $7.5M, roughly 1.8× Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -2.1%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALPHA PRO TECH LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.3% vs -4.4%). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.0K vs $-1.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs 1.4%).
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of disposable protective apparel, face masks, and building supply products including weather-resistant barriers. It primarily serves the healthcare, industrial, and construction sectors, with core operating markets concentrated in North America.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate, formerly Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc., is an international franchiser, confectionery manufacturer and retail operator in the United States, with outlets in Panama and the Philippines. The company is based in the town of Durango, Colorado, United States of America.
APT vs RMCF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.9M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | $698.0K | $-155.0K |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.3% | -4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -17.6% | 81.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.5M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $698.0K | $-155.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $976.0K | $-662.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $-324.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $613.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.0K | $-847.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $862.0K | $-722.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $576.0K | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 37.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 24.3% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -30.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | -8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | -25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | -21.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | -32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | -25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | -21.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.05 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $17.0M | $641.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $62.5M | $6.0M |
| Total Assets | $74.1M | $20.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.0M | $641.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5M | $893.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.4M | $720.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | $973.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $637.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | $62.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.7M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.6M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $74.1M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.2M | $21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.7M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.3M | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.7M | $20.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $318.0K | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.0K | $-1.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | -16.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $318.0K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $-488.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $350.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-873.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $129.0K |
| Q4 25 | $51.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-544.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $182.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | $-352.3K |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | -16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -29.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -72.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | -40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.3% | -4.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.1% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APT
| Other | $7.3M | 53% |
| Disposable Protective Apparel | $6.6M | 47% |
RMCF
| Manufacturing | $5.9M | 78% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.2M | 16% |
| Other | $414.0K | 5% |
