vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aptiv (APTV) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaher Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $5.1B, roughly 1.2× Aptiv). Danaher Corporation runs the higher net margin — 17.3% vs 3.8%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aptiv posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.4% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Danaher Corporation's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Aptiv PLC is an American automotive technology supplier with headquarters in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Aptiv grew out of the now-defunct American company, Delphi Automotive Systems, which itself was formerly a component of General Motors.
Danaher CorporationDHREarnings & Financial Report
Danaher Corporation is an American healthcare company headquartered in Washington, D.C.. It develops products used for advances in biotechnology, life sciences, and diagnostics. The company operates three divisions: biotechnology, which develops products for the development of therapeutics; life sciences, which develops products to identify causes of disease, new therapies, and to test and manufacture new drugs, vaccines and gene editing technologies; and diagnostics, which develops instruments,...
APTV vs DHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1B | $6.0B |
| Net Profit | $191.0M | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | 18.1% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 22.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | 17.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.4% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.7% | 7.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $1.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $5.7B |
| Q1 26 | $191.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-355.0M | $908.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $954.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.0M | $818.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.0M | $907.0M |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | 60.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | 58.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 58.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 59.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 59.7% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 21.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 20.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 15.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.88 | $1.45 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.63 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.80 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $1.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.47 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $25.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.99× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $17.0B |
| Q1 26 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $52.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $51.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $52.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $50.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $49.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $51.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $49.9B |
| Q1 26 | $25.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.4B | $83.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5B | $79.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $81.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1B | $79.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5B | $77.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $80.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $78.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | 0.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-362.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.41× | 1.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $818.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $-362.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $651.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | 4.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.41× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.93× | 1.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | 1.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APTV
| Electrical Distribution Systems | $2.2B | 43% |
| Engineered Components | $1.7B | 33% |
| Intelligent Systems | $1.4B | 28% |
DHR
Segment breakdown not available.
