vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aptiv (APTV) and Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aptiv is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $400.5M, roughly 12.9× Shake Shack Inc.). Shake Shack Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs 2.7%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shake Shack Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.9% vs 5.0%). Aptiv produced more free cash flow last quarter ($651.0M vs $4.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Shake Shack Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Aptiv PLC is an American automotive technology supplier with headquarters in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Aptiv grew out of the now-defunct American company, Delphi Automotive Systems, which itself was formerly a component of General Motors.
Shake Shack is an American multinational fast casual restaurant chain based in New York City. It started out as a hot dog cart inside Madison Square Park in 2001, and its popularity steadily grew. In 2004, it received a permit to open a permanent kiosk within the park, expanding its menu from New York–style hot dogs to one with hamburgers, hot dogs, fries and its namesake milkshakes.
APTV vs SHAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $400.5M |
| Net Profit | $138.0M | $11.8M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 4.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.0% | 21.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | 35.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $400.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $367.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $356.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $320.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $328.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $316.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $316.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $290.5M |
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-355.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.0M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.0M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.63 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.80 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.47 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.79 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $360.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.5B | $247.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $525.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.4B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | 0.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $360.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $357.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $312.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $320.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $310.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $941.0M | $284.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $247.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $246.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $246.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | $246.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $246.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $245.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $525.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $509.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $494.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $473.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $470.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $456.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $462.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1B | $446.4M |
| Q4 25 | $23.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 0.55× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $818.0M | $63.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $651.0M | $4.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.6% | 1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 14.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.93× | 5.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $56.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $818.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.0M | $30.7M |
| Q4 25 | $651.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.0M | $10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.0M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.93× | 5.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | 5.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | 5.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 15.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APTV
| Electrical Distribution Systems | $2.3B | 45% |
| Engineered Components Group | $1.4B | 28% |
| Active Safety | $716.0M | 14% |
| User Experience And Other | $564.0M | 11% |
| Smart Vehicle Compute And Software | $154.0M | 3% |
SHAK
Segment breakdown not available.