vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) and Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Candel Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($102.0K vs $90.7K, roughly 1.1× Arrive AI Inc.). Arrive AI Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4066.2% vs -8622.5%, a 4556.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Arrive AI Inc. develops and delivers AI-powered logistics and supply chain optimization solutions. Its core offerings include intelligent route planning, automated load matching, and operational efficiency tools targeted at e-commerce merchants, freight forwarders, and small-to-medium logistics operators across the North American market, helping cut operational costs and shorten delivery cycles.
Candel Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in developing oncolytic immunotherapies for cancer treatment. Its product pipeline covers solid tumors and hematological malignancies, serving global oncology markets and addressing unmet medical needs for patients with limited treatment options.
ARAI vs CADL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $90.7K | $102.0K |
| Net Profit | $-3.7M | $-8.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4066.2% | -9444.1% |
| Net Margin | -4066.2% | -8622.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 229.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -906.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $90.7K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $102.0K | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $32.0K | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $31.0K | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $31.0K | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $31.0K |
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-874.0K |
| Q2 25 | -4066.2% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -9444.1% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -25318.8% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -28648.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -28235.5% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | -28987.1% |
| Q2 25 | -4066.2% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -8622.5% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -15884.4% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -28025.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -13383.9% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | -2819.4% |
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $59.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | $39.7M |
| Total Assets | $8.5M | $67.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $59.3M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $77.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $86.8M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $94.3M |
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $60.1M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $63.8M |
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $67.2M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $77.7M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $93.3M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $101.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | $-10.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-11.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -10742.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 135.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-35.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-8.1M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-8.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -10742.2% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | -22378.1% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -30964.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -24941.9% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | -26529.0% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 135.3% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 862.5% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 693.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 2048.4% | ||
| Q1 22 | — | 551.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
