vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arrive AI Inc. (ARAI) and Largo Inc. (LGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arrive AI Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.7K vs $87.6K, roughly 1.0× Largo Inc.). Largo Inc. runs the higher net margin — -59.3% vs -4066.2%, a 4006.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Arrive AI Inc. develops and delivers AI-powered logistics and supply chain optimization solutions. Its core offerings include intelligent route planning, automated load matching, and operational efficiency tools targeted at e-commerce merchants, freight forwarders, and small-to-medium logistics operators across the North American market, helping cut operational costs and shorten delivery cycles.
Largo Inc. is a Canada-based critical minerals producer focused on sustainable vanadium extraction and processing. It operates core production assets in Brazil, supplying high-purity vanadium products for steel manufacturing, grid-scale energy storage, and industrial clients across global markets.
ARAI vs LGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $90.7K | $87.6K |
| Net Profit | $-3.7M | $-52.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4066.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -4066.2% | -59.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $87.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.7K | $54.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.2K |
| Q3 25 | — | $-52.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-40.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $715 |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4066.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4066.2% | -73.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -64.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $8.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0K |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
