vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN REBEL HOLDINGS INC (AREB) and ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN REBEL HOLDINGS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3M vs $1.7M, roughly 1.3× ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.). ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — -6.3% vs -257.5%, a 251.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN REBEL HOLDINGS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -47.0%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN REBEL HOLDINGS INC's revenue compounded faster (-24.7% CAGR vs -56.8%).
Rebel Foods is an Indian online restaurant company which operates 11 cloud kitchen brands including Faasos, Behrouz Biryani and Oven Story. It is the largest cloud kitchen restaurant chain in the world, operating more than 450 cloud kitchens in 10 countries, as of April 2022.
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc., trading under the symbol CNET, is a China-based technology enterprise focused on delivering integrated digital marketing solutions, big data analysis services, and intelligent operation tools for enterprise clients across sectors including e-commerce, consumer goods, and internet services. Its offerings help clients optimize user acquisition efficiency, boost operational performance, and advance digital transformation, primarily serving the Chinese domestic market and select Asia-Pacific clients.
AREB vs CNET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $1.7M |
| Net Profit | $-5.9M | $-108.0K |
| Gross Margin | -11.2% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | -171.0% | -8.9% |
| Net Margin | -257.5% | -6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | -47.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.4% | 94.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-63152.93 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.2M | $-108.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.1M | $-531.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.9M | $-781.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-216.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-850.0K |
| Q4 25 | -11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.7% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.8% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | -171.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -196.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -147.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -118.1% | -35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -277.8% | -24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.5% | -61.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -121.3% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -56.3% | -26.1% |
| Q4 25 | -257.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -278.6% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -638.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -201.5% | -32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -443.1% | -34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -74.8% | -59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -161.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -66.8% | -24.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-63152.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.44 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.45 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12273143.74 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3032.24 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-201.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.47 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $147.6K | $1.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $31.8M | $9.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $147.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $722.2K | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.7K | $807.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $287.5K | $812.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.7K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $452.8K | $510.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $674.9K | $467.0K |
| Q4 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $5.4M |
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.7M | $11.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-482.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-482.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-546.5K | $-984.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-830.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-198.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $-677.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $-353.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -61.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AREB
Segment breakdown not available.
CNET
| Online Advertising Placement | $1.6M | 95% |
| Other | $83.0K | 5% |
