vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ares Management Corp (ARES) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.1× Ares Management Corp). Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 5.9% vs 3.6%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ares Management Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 14.2%).
Ares Management Corporation is a global alternative investment manager operating in the credit, private equity and real estate markets. The company was founded in 1997, with additional offices across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
ARES vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $54.2M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.6% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.5% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -69.4% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $788.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $707.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $54.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.1M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $177.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.9M | $-88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $28.6B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $28.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2B | $73.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.4B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-483.7M | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.92× | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-483.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $415.7M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $807.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $841.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.2M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $710.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.03× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.28× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.55× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.55× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARES
| Management Service | $991.1M | 66% |
| Management Service Incentive | $206.7M | 14% |
| Carried Interest | $205.4M | 14% |
| Fee Related Performance Revenues | $113.3M | 8% |
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
