vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.0× AdvanSix Inc.). Arhaus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -0.8%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 5.1%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
ARHS vs ASIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $359.9M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | -0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -892.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $359.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $374.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $377.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $329.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $398.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $453.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $352.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $-17.4M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $1.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $815.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $815.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $818.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $823.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $794.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $774.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $766.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $746.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | $713.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $63.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $36.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 10.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $6.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $64.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $-36.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $66.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $-71.6M |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 182.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 2.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
