vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $208.8M, roughly 1.7× Bandwidth Inc.). Arhaus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 1.9%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bandwidth Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs 5.1%). Bandwidth Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.0M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Bandwidth Inc. is a communications platform as a service company. It sells software application programming interfaces for voice, text messaging and emergency services, using its own global IP voice network.
ARHS vs BAND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $208.8M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $4.0M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 60.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | 200.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $207.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $191.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $174.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $210.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $193.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $173.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $413.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $4.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 37.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -3.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $47.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $405.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $984.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $47.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $80.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $79.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $76.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $405.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $400.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $392.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $345.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $312.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $336.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $307.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $984.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $964.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $989.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $-1.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $31.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $24.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 49.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 6.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
BAND
Segment breakdown not available.