vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $185.2M, roughly 2.0× AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.). Arhaus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 0.9%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 5.1%). AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 11.2%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
ARHS vs FOLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -88.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $-48.4M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 85.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 90.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 90.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 91.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | -25.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -43.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $293.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $392.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $274.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $949.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $250.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $260.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $392.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $392.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $391.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $390.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $388.4M |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $230.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $193.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | $130.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $949.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $789.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $786.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $749.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $721.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 9.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $29.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $-29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 9.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | -0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |
