vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $270.8M, roughly 1.3× HUTCHMED (China) Ltd). Arhaus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs 0.7%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-8.8M).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
ARHS vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
