vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $219.1M, roughly 1.7× Iridium Communications Inc.). Iridium Communications Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 4.1%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Iridium Communications Inc. is a publicly traded American company headquartered in McLean, Virginia, United States. Iridium operates the Iridium satellite constellation, a system of 80 satellites: 66 are active satellites and the remaining fourteen function as in-orbit spares. Iridium Satellites are used for worldwide voice and data communication from handheld satellite phones, satellite messenger communication devices and integrated transceivers, as well as for two-way satellite messaging se...
ARHS vs IRDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $219.1M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 23.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $219.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $226.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $216.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $214.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $201.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $32.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 16.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $79.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $93.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $159.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $63.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $462.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $473.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $518.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $576.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $786.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 13.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $108.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $100.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $61.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $104.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $81.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $79.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $36.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $100.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $68.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 34.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 4.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 5.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 2.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 2.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 2.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
IRDM
| Voice and data | $57.4M | 26% |
| IoT data (2) | $46.0M | 21% |
| Government | $39.5M | 18% |
| Government service revenue (5) | $27.6M | 13% |
| Subscriber equipment | $20.2M | 9% |
| Hosted payload and other data service (4) | $14.8M | 7% |
| Broadband (3) | $12.2M | 6% |
| Commercial | $1.3M | 1% |
