vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $364.8M, roughly 1.5× Arhaus, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 4.1%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

ARHS vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.5× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$364.8M
ARHS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ARHS
ARHS
+1.2% gap
ARHS
5.1%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
25.7% more per $
KIM
29.8%
4.1%
ARHS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ARHS
ARHS
Annualised
ARHS
11.2%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$364.8M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$15.1M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
38.1%
Operating Margin
5.6%
37.2%
Net Margin
4.1%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
5.1%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-29.1%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$364.8M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$344.6M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$358.4M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$311.4M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$347.0M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$319.1M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$309.8M
$500.2M
Net Profit
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$15.1M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$12.2M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$35.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$4.9M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$21.3M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$9.9M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$22.2M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
38.1%
Q3 25
38.7%
Q2 25
41.4%
Q1 25
37.1%
Q4 24
40.0%
Q3 24
38.6%
Q2 24
40.1%
Operating Margin
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
5.6%
36.4%
Q3 25
4.8%
34.9%
Q2 25
13.0%
39.2%
Q1 25
1.7%
33.6%
Q4 24
8.2%
31.7%
Q3 24
3.3%
33.7%
Q2 24
9.5%
32.1%
Net Margin
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
4.1%
27.9%
Q3 25
3.5%
25.7%
Q2 25
9.8%
31.0%
Q1 25
1.6%
24.8%
Q4 24
6.1%
31.6%
Q3 24
3.1%
26.8%
Q2 24
7.2%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$0.09
Q2 25
$0.25
Q1 25
$0.03
Q4 24
$0.15
Q3 24
$0.07
Q2 24
$0.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$253.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$418.2M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$1.4B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$253.4M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$262.2M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$234.8M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$214.4M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$197.5M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$177.7M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$174.2M
$126.4M
Total Debt
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$418.2M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$400.4M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$385.6M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$348.8M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$343.7M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$320.6M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$309.3M
$10.6B
Total Assets
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$9.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.62×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$59.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.3M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$46.1M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$34.9M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$46.5M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$31.7M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$31.1M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$47.5M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-8.8M
Q3 25
$28.0M
Q2 25
$20.9M
Q1 25
$18.9M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$13.0M
Q3 24
$4.6M
Q2 24
$11.3M
FCF Margin
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
-2.4%
Q3 25
8.1%
Q2 25
5.8%
Q1 25
6.1%
38.3%
Q4 24
3.7%
Q3 24
1.4%
Q2 24
3.6%
Capex Intensity
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.0%
0.0%
Q3 25
5.3%
0.0%
Q2 25
3.9%
0.0%
Q1 25
8.9%
3.4%
Q4 24
5.4%
Q3 24
8.3%
Q2 24
11.7%
Cash Conversion
ARHS
ARHS
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.62×
1.71×
Q3 25
3.77×
2.41×
Q2 25
1.00×
1.87×
Q1 25
9.53×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.49×
1.44×
Q3 24
3.14×
2.18×
Q2 24
2.14×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ARHS
ARHS

Sales Channel Retail$305.7M84%
Sales Channel E Commerce$59.2M16%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons