vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $364.8M, roughly 1.9× Arhaus, Inc.). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 4.1%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs 3.6%). Arhaus, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.8M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
ARHS vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.
