vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.5× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 4.1%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs 2.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 11.2%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
ARHS vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |