vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $364.8M, roughly 1.2× Arhaus, Inc.). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 4.1%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 5.1%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 5.2%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
ARHS vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
