vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.3M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.6× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 39.9% vs 7.0%, a 32.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that originates, acquires and manages commercial real estate debt assets including mortgages, mezzanine loans and mortgage-backed securities, primarily operating in the U.S. market to deliver consistent risk-adjusted returns.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
ARI vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.3M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $29.2M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 39.7% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | 39.9% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.2% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.6M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.5M | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-91.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-104.5M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -127.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.2% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -129.6% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -127.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -129.8% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.69 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.76 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $139.8M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.9B | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $9.9B | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $139.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $245.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.3M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $161.2M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2B | $321.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $142.5M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.88× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $142.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.88× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.40× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
