vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS INC (ARL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.6M vs $13.0M, roughly 1.0× AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS INC). AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 75.2% vs -16.4%, a 91.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN REALTY INVESTORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -48.5%).
Weingarten Realty Investors was a real estate investment trust that invested in shopping centers, primarily in the Southern United States and primarily with grocery stores as the anchor stores. In August 2021, the company was acquired by Kimco Realty.
Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.
ARL vs FPH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.0M | $13.6M |
| Net Profit | $9.8M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -23.3% | -43.5% |
| Net Margin | 75.2% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6175.8% | -109.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $75.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.0M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.8M | $51.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0K | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-161.0K | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -43.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -23.3% | 89.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -14.8% | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.8% | 83.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | 86.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | -16.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.2% | 77.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 156.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | 177.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 75.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -150.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.1M | $332.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $214.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $617.4M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $89.1M | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.8M | $351.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.5M | $456.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.7M | $528.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.7M | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $131.6M | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.5M | $217.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $227.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $201.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $185.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $617.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $607.8M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $607.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $604.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $601.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $602.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $619.9M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.6M | $-44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-44.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-5.6M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $40.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $-71.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $116.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | $-18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-503.0K | $-23.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $115.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 138.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -959.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 430.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -106.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -46.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.57× | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.81× | 1.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.03× | -21.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.50× | 2.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.43× | -1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
