vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) and Guardforce AI Co., Ltd. (GFAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arlo Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($141.3M vs $18.0M, roughly 7.8× Guardforce AI Co., Ltd.). Arlo Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -76.9%, a 81.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arlo Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.2% vs 6.3%).
Arlo Technologies is an American company that makes wireless surveillance cameras. Prior to an initial public offering (IPO) on the New York Stock Exchange in August 2018, Arlo was a brand of such products by Netgear, which retained majority control after the IPO.
Guardforce AI Co., Ltd. is a global provider of AI-integrated security solutions. Its core offerings include intelligent surveillance systems, AI-powered access control, autonomous security robots, and smart logistics monitoring services, serving enterprise, retail, financial and public sector clients across Asia, Europe and North America.
ARLO vs GFAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.3M | $18.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.8M | $-13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | -66.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | -76.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 218.6% | -118.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $-4.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-835.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $146.4M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $127.8M | $25.0M |
| Total Assets | $310.5M | $64.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $146.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $310.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $350.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $296.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $298.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $312.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $295.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.8M | $-1.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLO
| Subscriptions And Services | $89.4M | 63% |
| Products | $51.9M | 37% |
GFAI
Segment breakdown not available.
