vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP) and AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($535.5M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.5× AdvanSix Inc.). ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 15.4% vs -0.8%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -9.2%). ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.1M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs -9.4%).
Alliance Resource Partners LP is a leading North American natural resource enterprise primarily engaged in the production and marketing of coal for utility and industrial customers. It also operates complementary business segments including mineral royalty management, oil and gas extraction, and logistics support services.
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
ARLP vs ASIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $535.5M | $359.9M |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $-2.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.2% | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | 15.4% | -0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.2% | 9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 406.2% | -892.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | $359.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.4M | $374.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.5M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.5M | $377.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.1M | $329.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6M | $398.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.4M | $453.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $651.7M | $336.8M |
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $352.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.1M | $-17.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | -7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | -5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.2M | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $815.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.4M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.0M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $815.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $818.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $823.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $774.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $766.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $746.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $713.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $143.9M | $63.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.1M | $36.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.5% | 10.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.4% | 7.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.74× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $387.9M | $6.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $143.9M | $63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.9M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | $64.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.3M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $209.7M | $-36.2M |
| Q4 25 | $99.1M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $66.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.8M | $-71.6M |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.2% | -21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.0% | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.31× | 182.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | 2.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLP
| Illinois Basin Segment | $339.0M | 63% |
| Appalachia Segment | $141.4M | 26% |
| Other | $24.2M | 5% |
| Royalties Coal Segment | $22.4M | 4% |
| Shipping And Handling | $10.2M | 2% |
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
