vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP) and Circle Internet Group, Inc. (CRCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Circle Internet Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($739.8M vs $516.0M, roughly 1.4× ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP). Circle Internet Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 29.0% vs 2.1%, a 26.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Circle Internet Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5113.5% vs -3.6%). ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.3M vs $-14.7M).
Alliance Resource Partners LP is a leading North American natural resource enterprise primarily engaged in the production and marketing of coal for utility and industrial customers. It also operates complementary business segments including mineral royalty management, oil and gas extraction, and logistics support services.
Circle is a payments technology company. Funded by Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville in 2013, it is currently headquartered in New York City and issues two types of stablecoin: USDC, which has a conversion rate pegged to the U.S. dollar, and EURC, which is euro-denominated. It also issues USYC, a tokenized money market fund.
ARLP vs CRCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $516.0M | $739.8M |
| Net Profit | $10.7M | $214.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 11.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | 29.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | 5113.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 202.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $516.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.4M | $739.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.5M | $658.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.4M | $6.8M |
| Q1 26 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.1M | $214.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $-482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $32.9M |
| Q1 26 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | -49.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | -73.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 486.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $76.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $457.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $460.9M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $76.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $64.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.3M | $-14.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.6% | -2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.5% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.05× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $342.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.9M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $303.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $296.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 45.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | -0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLP
| Coal sales | $443.3M | 86% |
| Oil & gas royalties | $41.3M | 8% |
| Other revenues | $22.8M | 4% |
| Transportation revenues | $8.6M | 2% |
| Tons Produced | $8.0M | 2% |
| Mineral Interest Volumes (BOE) | $1.0M | 0% |
CRCL
Segment breakdown not available.
