vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP) and National Vision Holdings, Inc. (EYE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($516.0M vs $487.3M, roughly 1.1× National Vision Holdings, Inc.). ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 2.1% vs 0.7%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Vision Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -3.6%). National Vision Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.3M vs $13.3M). Over the past eight quarters, National Vision Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.6% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Alliance Resource Partners LP is a leading North American natural resource enterprise primarily engaged in the production and marketing of coal for utility and industrial customers. It also operates complementary business segments including mineral royalty management, oil and gas extraction, and logistics support services.
Vision Research is an international company that manufactures high-speed digital cameras based in Wayne, New Jersey. Their cameras are marketed under the Phantom brand, and are used in a broad variety of industries including: defense, industrial product development, manufacturing, automotive, scientific research, and entertainment. Vision Research is a business unit of the Materials Analysis Division of Ametek Inc., a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices.
ARLP vs EYE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $516.0M | $487.3M |
| Net Profit | $10.7M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 2.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 139.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $516.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.4M | $487.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.5M | $486.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.5M | $510.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.1M | $437.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6M | $451.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.4M | $451.7M |
| Q1 26 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $-28.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $-3.1M |
| Q1 26 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $56.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $236.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $858.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.5M | $56.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $73.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.4M | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $179.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $236.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $255.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $244.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $248.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $143.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $850.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $836.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $816.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $840.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $843.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $46.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.3M | $30.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.6% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.5% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 13.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $342.2M | $83.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.9M | $46.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7M | $32.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | $30.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.3M | $27.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | $51.5M |
| Q1 26 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.3M | $31.9M |
| Q1 26 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 13.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | 2.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLP
| Coal sales | $443.3M | 86% |
| Oil & gas royalties | $41.3M | 8% |
| Other revenues | $22.8M | 4% |
| Transportation revenues | $8.6M | 2% |
| Tons Produced | $8.0M | 2% |
| Mineral Interest Volumes (BOE) | $1.0M | 0% |
EYE
Segment breakdown not available.
