vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP) and FTI CONSULTING, INC (FCN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FTI CONSULTING, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($990.7M vs $516.0M, roughly 1.9× ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP). FTI CONSULTING, INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 2.1%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FTI CONSULTING, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.7% vs -3.6%). FTI CONSULTING, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($351.4M vs $13.3M). Over the past eight quarters, FTI CONSULTING, INC's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Alliance Resource Partners LP is a leading North American natural resource enterprise primarily engaged in the production and marketing of coal for utility and industrial customers. It also operates complementary business segments including mineral royalty management, oil and gas extraction, and logistics support services.
FTI Consulting is a business consultancy firm founded in 1982 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., United States. The company specializes in corporate finance and restructuring, economic consulting, forensic and litigation consulting, strategic communications, technology and strategy consulting. FTI Consulting employs more than 7,700 staff in 31 countries and is one of the largest financial consulting firms worldwide.
ARLP vs FCN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $516.0M | $990.7M |
| Net Profit | $10.7M | $54.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | 10.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 9.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $516.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | $990.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.4M | $956.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.5M | $943.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.5M | $898.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.1M | $894.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6M | $926.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.4M | $949.2M |
| Q1 26 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.1M | $82.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $61.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | $66.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $83.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $265.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.5M | $146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $152.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $151.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $660.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.4M | $386.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $226.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $359.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.3M | $351.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.6% | 35.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.5% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $342.2M | $93.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.9M | $359.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.9M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $55.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7M | $-465.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | $315.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.3M | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | $135.2M |
| Q1 26 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.1M | $351.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $38.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $-483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $301.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.3M | $125.2M |
| Q1 26 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -53.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | 6.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 2.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | -7.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.31× | 6.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | 3.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLP
| Coal sales | $443.3M | 86% |
| Oil & gas royalties | $41.3M | 8% |
| Other revenues | $22.8M | 4% |
| Transportation revenues | $8.6M | 2% |
| Tons Produced | $8.0M | 2% |
| Mineral Interest Volumes (BOE) | $1.0M | 0% |
FCN
| Corporate Finance Segment | $423.2M | 43% |
| Forensic And Litigation Consulting | $192.9M | 19% |
| Economic Consulting | $176.2M | 18% |
| Strategic Communications | $99.4M | 10% |
| Other | $99.0M | 10% |
