vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARM HOLDINGS PLC (ARM) and Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ARM HOLDINGS PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $685.2M, roughly 1.8× Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC). ARM HOLDINGS PLC runs the higher net margin — 18.0% vs -44.4%, a 62.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. ARM HOLDINGS PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($186.0M vs $-709.7M).
Arm Holdings plc is a British semiconductor and software design company headquartered in Cambridge, UK. It designs the Arm CPU architecture and licenses its processor designs and related intellectual property to chipmakers and device manufacturers worldwide. Arm-based chips power the vast majority of smartphones and an increasing share of laptops, data center servers, and embedded devices. The company listed on Nasdaq in September 2023 and remains majority-owned by SoftBank.
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC, or simply Polestar, is a Swedish automotive manufacturer that produces electric cars. Principally owned by Li Shufu's PSD Investment, Geely Holding and Volvo Cars, the company is headquartered in Torslanda, outside Gothenburg, Sweden. With an "asset-light" approach in development and manufacturing, Polestar does not have its own manufacturing facility; instead it produces cars in facilities controlled by Volvo or Geely in several countries, including China,...
ARM vs PSNY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $685.2M |
| Net Profit | $223.0M | $-304.1M |
| Gross Margin | 97.6% | -0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | -72.6% |
| Net Margin | 18.0% | -44.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.21 | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $983.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $844.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $939.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $824.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $806.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $223.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-110.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 97.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 97.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 97.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 97.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 95.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 94.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -19.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -13.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.8B | $-456.3M |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $4.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $6.8B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $365.0M | $-666.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $186.0M | $-709.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.0% | -103.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.4% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.64× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.2B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $365.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $423.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-290.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $310.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $227.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-319.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $289.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $193.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.0% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 23.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 4.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.30× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARM
| Royalty | $737.0M | 59% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.0M | 24% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $211.0M | 17% |
PSNY
Segment breakdown not available.
