vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aramark (ARMK) and Edison International (EIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edison International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $4.8B, roughly 1.1× Aramark). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 2.0%, a 33.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Edison International posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.8% vs 6.1%). Edison International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-319.0M vs $-904.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Edison International's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs 7.3%).
Aramark is an American food service and facilities services provider to clients in areas including education, prisons, healthcare, business, and leisure. It operates in North America and an additional 14 countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, Chile, Ireland, and Spain.
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
ARMK vs EIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $96.2M | $1.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 443.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | $4.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $87.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.6M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.4M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $439.0M |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 56.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.39 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.6M | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2B | $38.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $17.6B |
| Total Assets | $13.5B | $94.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.94× | 2.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $439.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $639.1M | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.5M | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $920.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.1M | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.5M | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.1M | $465.0M |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $38.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $35.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $34.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $34.8B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.3B | $94.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $88.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5B | $88.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $85.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $84.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $84.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.61× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | 2.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-782.2M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-904.4M | $-319.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.7% | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 36.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.13× | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-715.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-782.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $882.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-587.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.7M | $329.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-904.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | $-830.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.1M | $-184.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-707.0M | $-326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $882.3M | $961.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.6M | $-1.1B |
| Q1 26 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -25.2% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | -8.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.56× | 3.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.35× | 4.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.42× | 0.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARMK
| Education | $1.1B | 22% |
| Sports Leisure Corrections | $961.2M | 20% |
| Food And Support Services International | $847.8M | 18% |
| Other | $621.6M | 13% |
| Businessand Industry | $510.6M | 11% |
| Health Care | $421.3M | 9% |
| Facility Services | $382.9M | 8% |
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
