vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aramark (ARMK) and ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P. (IEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aramark is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.8× ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P.). Aramark runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs 0.0%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aramark posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs 5.4%). ICAHN ENTERPRISES L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-496.0M vs $-904.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Aramark's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs 4.5%).
Aramark is an American food service and facilities services provider to clients in areas including education, prisons, healthcare, business, and leisure. It operates in North America and an additional 14 countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, Chile, Ireland, and Spain.
Icahn Enterprises L.P. is an American publicly traded master limited partnership and conglomerate headquartered at Milton Tower in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida. The company has investments in various industries including energy, automotive, food packaging, metals, real estate and home fashion. The company is controlled by Carl Icahn, who owns 86 percent of it.
ARMK vs IEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $96.2M | $1.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 0.6% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 101.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.36 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $87.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $287.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $-165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.9M | $-422.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.6M | $-98.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.1M | $-331.0M |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | -10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -21.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | -22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -15.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.6M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $13.5B | $14.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.94× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $439.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $639.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $920.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $436.1M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.3B | $14.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.3B | $14.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7B | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5B | $18.0B |
| Q1 26 | 1.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.71× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-782.2M | $-421.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-904.4M | $-496.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.7% | -18.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -8.13× | -421.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-654.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-782.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-421.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $275.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.9M | $-182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-587.2M | $244.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $-54.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.7M | $893.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-904.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-496.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-67.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | $179.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.1M | $-270.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-707.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $882.3M | $-112.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.6M | $827.0M |
| Q1 26 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | -14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -15.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | -8.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -421.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.35× | -2.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARMK
| Education | $1.1B | 22% |
| Sports Leisure Corrections | $961.2M | 20% |
| Food And Support Services International | $847.8M | 18% |
| Other | $621.6M | 13% |
| Businessand Industry | $510.6M | 11% |
| Health Care | $421.3M | 9% |
| Facility Services | $382.9M | 8% |
IEP
| Public Utilities Inventory Petroleum Products | $1.6B | 61% |
| Other | $381.0M | 14% |
| Automotive Services | $345.0M | 13% |
| Nitrogen Fertilizer Products | $131.0M | 5% |
| Food Packaging Segment | $82.0M | 3% |
| Home Fashion Segment | $45.0M | 2% |
| Renewable Products | $32.0M | 1% |
| Pharma Segment | $23.0M | 1% |
| Holding Company | $11.0M | 0% |
