vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aris Mining Corp (ARMN) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8M vs $151.1K, roughly 24.8× Aris Mining Corp). Aris Mining Corp runs the higher net margin — 13.6% vs -117.1%, a 130.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Endeavour Mining plc is a multinational mining company that owns and operates gold mines in Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Senegal. The company is headquartered in London, England, and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.
Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. is a precious metals royalty and streaming firm focused on gold, silver, and strategic mineral assets primarily across North America. It partners with mining operators to earn stable, leveraged returns without incurring the high costs and operational risks of direct mine ownership, catering to investors seeking low-volatility exposure to precious metals markets.
ARMN vs MTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.1K | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $20.5K | $-4.4M |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 13.6% | -117.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $151.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $981.0K |
| Q4 25 | $20.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -102.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -176.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -121.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -117.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -151.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -138.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $99.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.82× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $99.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
