vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Aris Mining Corp (ARMN) and Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SGLY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Aris Mining Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.1K vs $147.6K, roughly 1.0× Singularity Future Technology Ltd.). Aris Mining Corp runs the higher net margin — 13.6% vs -451.2%, a 464.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Endeavour Mining plc is a multinational mining company that owns and operates gold mines in Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Senegal. The company is headquartered in London, England, and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.

Singularity Education Group is an American company that offers executive educational programs, a business incubator, and business consultancy services. Although the company uses the word "university" in its branding, it is not an accredited university and has no academic programs or accreditation.

ARMN vs SGLY — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ARMN
ARMN
1.0× larger
ARMN
$151.1K
$147.6K
SGLY
Higher net margin
ARMN
ARMN
464.8% more per $
ARMN
13.6%
-451.2%
SGLY

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Revenue
$151.1K
$147.6K
Net Profit
$20.5K
$-665.9K
Gross Margin
44.9%
Operating Margin
30.0%
-407.0%
Net Margin
13.6%
-451.2%
Revenue YoY
-68.9%
Net Profit YoY
-103.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.02
$-0.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$151.1K
$147.6K
Q3 25
$307.9K
Q2 25
$474.1K
Q1 25
$363.1K
Q4 24
$474.6K
Q3 24
$501.4K
Q2 24
$832.9K
Q1 24
$446.6K
Net Profit
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$20.5K
$-665.9K
Q3 25
$-9.5M
Q2 25
$-952.5K
Q1 25
$-1.7M
Q4 24
$-327.8K
Q3 24
$-961.8K
Q2 24
$-918.8K
Q1 24
$-949.8K
Gross Margin
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
44.9%
Q3 25
3.4%
Q2 25
2.1%
Q1 25
83.4%
Q4 24
2.2%
Q3 24
-54.2%
Q2 24
-10.6%
Q1 24
-59.9%
Operating Margin
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
30.0%
-407.0%
Q3 25
-183.5%
Q2 25
38.0%
Q1 25
-325.5%
Q4 24
-144.2%
Q3 24
-204.5%
Q2 24
-115.4%
Q1 24
-313.2%
Net Margin
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
13.6%
-451.2%
Q3 25
-3077.1%
Q2 25
-200.9%
Q1 25
-460.1%
Q4 24
-69.1%
Q3 24
-191.8%
Q2 24
-110.3%
Q1 24
-212.7%
EPS (diluted)
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$0.02
$-0.12
Q3 25
$-2.25
Q2 25
$-0.24
Q1 25
$-0.46
Q4 24
$-0.09
Q3 24
$-0.27
Q2 24
$-1.54
Q1 24
$-0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.7M
Total Assets
$21.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$15.2M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$4.7M
Q3 25
$3.1M
Q2 25
$12.5M
Q1 25
$13.6M
Q4 24
$14.7M
Q3 24
$12.1M
Q2 24
$16.0M
Q1 24
$14.3M
Total Assets
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$21.6M
Q3 25
$17.6M
Q2 25
$18.2M
Q1 25
$18.4M
Q4 24
$19.1M
Q3 24
Q2 24
$18.7M
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$99.1K
$-8.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.82×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
$99.1K
$-8.6M
Q3 25
$-1.3M
Q2 25
$-2.3M
Q1 25
$-745.2K
Q4 24
$407.0K
Q3 24
$-9.1K
Q2 24
$126.0K
Q1 24
$1.4M
Capex Intensity
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.0%
Cash Conversion
ARMN
ARMN
SGLY
SGLY
Q4 25
4.82×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons